HOW TO RUN A MAD WORLD

In this podcast, Russell Brand shares the spectacle of UK PM Liz Truss assuring the British public (to spontaneous applause!) that she'll opt for Mutually Assured Destruction if push comes to shove, to defeat those who oppose our democratic way of life. In the same podcast Brand also shares that the Biden Administration now 'refuses to publish military expenditure', i.e. the American public are not to know how much of their money he's spending on ‘defence’. 

What?

Meanwhile, Dr. John Campbell is wondering what might be causing double the rates of 'long Covid' in the U.S. than in the UK - what U.S. authorities are calling a 'mass disabling event'. Listing several possibilities, he ends cryptically with 'Is it related to factors we're really not at liberty to discuss?'  

Slipping that slyly in without further elaboration, he adroitly forestalls the question this lacuna begs - namely, might it have something to do with the higher American rates of mRNA injections? - by volunteering that 'We don't have data that compares vaccinated with unvaccinated people for the level of long Covid. We don't have that data. We simply don't have it. We simply - don't - know.'  

 

Once again, What?? 

 

Because this is another can of worms that Dr. John Campbell, and indeed the entire, politically correct MSM cannot open. It is sealed in a conspiracy of silence.

 

But Archbishop Carlo Maria Vigano, outside the sealed, secular order, has a can opener. Just the other day he opined in an interview here that 

'[T]he vaccination of an experimental gene serum must be imposed on everyone so that people will not see that the adverse effects and deaths affect only the vaccinated...' 

 

We're not conspiracy theorists, are we, but if this naked slander were true, then indeed it would become necessary to hide the data if it would reveal such a difference. Right? Fortunately this cannot be the case, or we'd all be f*ck*d, and Vigano, were he a news anchor, would be rightly silenced for letting the side down for even suggesting it. 

 

Which leaves us, however, with this conundrum - Why do we consider it thinkable that our leaders might order our annihilation by means of a potentially imminent nuclear exchange, but not that they might be already more selectively culling us by potentially lethal injection? 

Let me propose a simple, if unflattering answer: the former requires us to do nothing except present a united front, demonstrating our national solidarity by our applause. It hasn't yet happened, it may never happen, and in its sheer magnitude it's all but unthinkable. PM Truss’s affirmative also displays an uncharacteristic, almost humourous candour on the part of a politician.  Her very assertion of it practically amounts to a denial. Politicians do not speak the truth about such momentous, indeed monstrous, issues.

 

The latter, however, displays none of these qualities, except the unthinkable  magnitude part. If true, it's already happening; we ourselves may actually be its victims, and although we know our politicians lie for a living, that's the forever unspoken part of the social contract whose spell must never be broken if, like hens in a chicken coop, we are to accept our present, more or less comfortable role in the social hierarchy. For the sake of our sense of community the myth of political transparency and a harmony of goals between us and our elites must be maintained.  That is the conspiracy!

 

Pablo